AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Serial number for masterwriter3/5/2023 Gledson argues that the infamous unreliability, skepticism and relativity that characterize the narrator of Dom Casmurro make up a "datable" phenomenon (3), and that Machado's ambiguity encourages "the reader" to read between the lines and arrive at a censure of the social structures and cultural assumptions motivating the novel's narrator. The essay in this volume mainly contests criticisms leveled at his earlier studies, especially his monograph, The Deceptive Realism of Machado de Assis (1984) and in particular the criticisms of Abel Barros Baptista, a vocal proponent of viewing Machado as an anti-realist. John Gledson's "Realism and Intentionalism Revisited" is a continuation of a long-standing line of argument, insisting that Machado de Assis was a realist in the sense that his works responded directly to Brazilian social, economic and cultural conditions of the time. The articles in this book are a continuation of those particular debates, and require some understanding of their history. While the general question of authorial intent may be compelling to virtually any student of literature, the debates specific to Machado de Assis have a life and history of their own. All of the essays engage in ongoing scholarly debates regarding Machado de Assis's authorial intent. This compendium is primarily of interest to specialists in Machado de Assis and, to a lesser degree, to Brazilianists in general. Graham's stated intention is to "call new attention" to Machado de Assis (vii) while presenting critical essays representative of the current disagreements over interpreting his work. Part of Texas's Critical Reflections on Latin America series, this volume comprises four essays, each taking a different approach to Machado de Assis's novels, and all concentrating on his most famous work, Dom Casmurro. Machado de Assis: Reflections on a Brazilian Master Writer. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content: If there is a competitor product out there, I will be switching next time. They put much more effort into designing the older software version compared to this amateur cloud version, which doesn't even look professional. Not only subscription-based but a much inferior product compared to the old. And they offered no PERMANENT discount or upgrade path for original owners, as it is now subscription-based only. This is a product I paid a lot of money for a supposed "lifetime" license only to find out it was not 'my lifetime' but rather the life of the product. To add insult to injury, they stopped supporting the older versions of Masterwriter so if you upgrade your operating system, they no longer work. I think this is just laziness on the part of the developers, as you must be connected to the internet to use the product. There is nothing wrong with making stand-alone software that syncs to the cloud and can be used across multiple devices. Here's an idea: Why not offer a software version that syncs with the cloud? If companies like Microsoft can offer a hybrid solution for their Office 365 products, so can these guys. I have pointed this out to the developers more than once (as have many others), but they always reply with this BS cookie-cutter template response claiming how much more money they could have made if they went with a software version, and why they switched to an ONLY cloud solution. First off, Master Writer 2 was a far superior program.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |